The VFD News Center for Pork is now part of Pig Health Today —
the first and only news website focused exclusively on swine health.

GO
visit www.pighealthtoday.com
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

.
Newspaper headlines shown side on in a stack of daily newspapers; Shutterstock ID 124029454; PO: vfd-w; Job: vfd-w; Client: prw

Print

Coming in 2016: Three proposed changes to the Veterinary Feed Directive

Major updates include increasing the number of VFD drugs, additional regulations and streamlining the administrative burden

 By Laura Fernandez

 

With an updated number of 283 drugs added to the new Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) program, nutritionists that currently rely on antimicrobial drugs

Christine Hoang, assistant director of scientific activities, American Veterinary Medical Association Credit: AVMA

Christine Hoang, assistant director of scientific activities, American Veterinary Medical Association
Credit: AVMA

for improving feed efficiency for production uses in food-animals may need to reformulate feeds to meet the regulations in 2016. But nutritionists aren’t the only ones that will be adapting to the proposed changes. A host of new VFD products and regulations are set to affect the industry as a whole — especially feed mills, veterinarians and producers.

The three major changes to the current VFD program include increasing the number of VFD drugs from two to 283 — these drugs will be approved accordingly for different uses such as to combat a variety of diseases in more than one species. Another major change is the amount of regulation, e.g. feed mill licensing for formulating and distributing VFD medicated feed. Last but not least are the proposed changes requested from the agriculture community to streamline the paperwork for an easier and more efficient administrative process.

What drugs are considered VFD drugs?

According to the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine, drugs that are VFD products are used in livestock feed. They are reviewed by the Center for Veterinary Medicine and are approved for use with a VFD in livestock feed for specific reasons. For example, proposed VFD drugs such as penicillin will be available for use in livestock feed for specific reasons like preventing a disease. In conjunction with listing the approved uses or reasons for administering a drug, VFD drugs also list the approved dosage amounts that can be used in medicated feed.

Richard Sellers, senior vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs, American Feed Industry Association Credit: AFIA

Richard Sellers, senior vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs, American Feed Industry Association
Credit: AFIA

The overall industry goal for the proposed VFD is to increase veterinary oversight on what drugs are used in feed, and for what reasons. This will also inadvertently limit the use of antimicrobial drugs in feed for increasing the rate of gain in food-producing-animals. Ultimately, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hopes that this will prevent bacteria from building a resistance to antibiotics — a goal that is widely accepted in the industry.

Antimicrobial classes that are proposed VFD drugs include aminoglycosides, lincosamides, macrolides, penicillins, streptogramins, sulfonamides and tetracyclines.

 

 

The three main changes

Here’s a list of the three areas to watch in the coming year:

1) 283 Over-the-counter drugs set to become VFD drugs

The proposed VFD will put veterinarians in charge of prescribing 283 different drugs. This is a jump from the current VFD program that is in place. “In 1997, when the VFD was started, there were only a few medications that were approved,” says Dr. Christine Hoang American Veterinary Medical Association assistant director in scientific activities. “The process was also very cumbersome with a lot of paperwork.”

With an increase of drugs added to the VFD program, Hoang says it’s imperative to streamline the process to make it as appropriate and efficient as possible.

“The most important thing to know is that even though the transition is difficult, we are working with all the stakeholders so that the transition is smooth, and veterinarians will have oversight of these products,” Hoang says.

In June 2014, AVMA held a VFD summit at their headquarters with representatives from every species and commodities group to gather feedback for the FDA regarding the proposed changes. “We had a lot of good responses,” says Hoang, “all of the stakeholders and the FDA are working together very well.”

2) Proposed regulation changes to feed mill licensing

Richard Sellers, American Feed Industry Association (AFIA) senior vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs, says that there are a lot of proposed regulation changes and new VFD drugs for the industry to adapt to using. “All of these changes are going to go into place in 2016,” says Sellers, adding that there may be a honeymoon period of a few months to help the industry adapt after the new VFD regulations are approved.

The current regulation reads that VFD drugs need to go through a category II feed mill to use a Type A medicated article drug — the most concentrated animal drug product that is used as a component to either manufacture another Type A medicated article, an intermediate Type B medicated feed or a formulation Type C medicated feed. However, the proposed rule removes the regulation that requires feed mills be either category I or category II to process feed. Whether or not feed mills will need a category I or a category II license will depend on FDA approval.

3) Electronic paperwork and e-signatures to streamline administration process

Sellers says that there are proposed changes to the VFD process that will streamline the process and make it more effective. “The current VFD requires two years of record keeping, while other record keeping is only required for one year,” he says. “We would like to see the proposed change for one year of record keeping to go into place.”

Other proposed changes include how the VFD order is delivered to the feed mill. The current VFD process requires a veterinarian to provide the producer with the original prescription and to deliver a paper copy to the feed mill within five days of writing the prescription. However, a proposed change would allow the veterinarian to fill out a form online using their e-signature. The form would then be sent electronically to the feed mill.

FDA encourages the agriculture industry to comment on the VFD

While the agriculture industry is supportive of the proposed VFD, there are still details and concerns that need to be worked out before regulations go into place in 2016. Some of these concerns include the industry’s ability to provide enough large animal vets to authorize VFDs and the type of training — if any — needed for these veterinarians to write VFDs. There are also concerns on how much, and how the medicated feed will be stored at feed mills. The FDA encourages comments from the industry regarding details and concerns. Industry members are also encouraged to keep in contact with industry organizations such as the AVMA, and AFIA through sessions and webinars.

 

 

View a list of VFD drugs 

Related content: What feed mills need to know about the Veterinary Feed Directive

 

This article is from Feed Management and can be accessed here.

Feed Management readers receive business management content, case studies and data about North American feed formulation, manufacturing, processing and distribution. Executives look to Feed Management to help them efficiently and safely formulate, process, distribute and market animal feeds. Jackie Roembke is editor of Feed Management, and her blog can be read here.

 


tags:
RELATED NEWS

>
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.